Parenthetical double negation?
--------------------------------------------------
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: City Beneath the Waves Looping
--
Chapters
00:00 Parenthetical Double Negation?
00:25 Accepted Answer Score 2
00:48 Answer 2 Score 2
01:05 Answer 3 Score 1
01:18 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#grammar #negation #doublenegation
#avk47
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: City Beneath the Waves Looping
--
Chapters
00:00 Parenthetical Double Negation?
00:25 Accepted Answer Score 2
00:48 Answer 2 Score 2
01:05 Answer 3 Score 1
01:18 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#grammar #negation #doublenegation
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 2
The sentence reads correctly, but a bit clumsily because legally and physically are not bound. By that I mean, the negation makes sense, but I have trouble immediately understanding what you're referring to with "legally, not physically." You might consider:
He cannot go outside (legally speaking, but not physically), because he is on house arrest.
ANSWER 2
Score 2
Because the term house arrest already provides a great deal of context, it probably isn't even necessary to include the word physically. Perhaps try rephrasing with something like:
Legally, he is not permitted to go outside because he is on house arrest.
ANSWER 3
Score 1
In legalese typically shall not is used. It avoids the ambiguity of the word can. May not would also seem to be appropriate.