Correct usage of "see" vs. "watch"
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Puzzling Curiosities
--
Chapters
00:00 Correct Usage Of &Quot;See&Quot; Vs. &Quot;Watch&Quot;
00:19 Accepted Answer Score 13
00:48 Answer 2 Score 4
01:06 Answer 3 Score 2
01:28 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#wordchoice #verbs #senseverbs #nonfiniteclausecomplementation
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 13
(text lifted from John Lawler's comment - he probably won't post it himself, but it's solid stuff)
The basic semantic difference between see and watch (and for that matter, look) is that see is non-volitional, while look and watch are volitional; additionally, watch is durative, i.e, it means that the looking went on for a while. In this context, the best fit is a matter of what you want to imply, and what you want to state, and that's up to the speaker in context.
ANSWER 2
Score 4
Watch has the connotation of both duration ("watch a movie") and vigilance ("watch your back!")
See typically means simply to successfully observe ("I see you!") There is a secondary meaning of "investigate" ("I'm going to see what's up.")
ANSWER 3
Score 2
There are supportable arguments for the use of either word. The sentence is meant to convey that the speaker has witnessed a process, "growing up". "Seen" can be used in relation to an event that occurs in an instant or or one that occurs over a period of time. However, "watched" is appropriate only in relation to an event that occurs over a period of time. Therefore, "watched" would be the better choice here.