Is 'worse' the only comparative that has neither -er nor more?
--------------------------------------------------
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Puzzle Game 3
--
Chapters
00:00 Is 'Worse' The Only Comparative That Has Neither -Er Nor More?
00:40 Answer 1 Score 1
00:51 Accepted Answer Score 11
01:24 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#etymology #comparatives #wordformation
#avk47
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Puzzle Game 3
--
Chapters
00:00 Is 'Worse' The Only Comparative That Has Neither -Er Nor More?
00:40 Answer 1 Score 1
00:51 Accepted Answer Score 11
01:24 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#etymology #comparatives #wordformation
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 11
Much/many, more, most and little/few, less/fewer, least/fewest are the positive, comparative, and superlative quantifiers in English. They come in two scales, with affirmative and negative increments.
Note that the negative scale distinguishes count (few, fewer, fewest) from mass (little, less, least) consistently, while the affirmative scale does so only in the positive degree (much, many); more and most don't distinguish mass from count - fewer people, less cheese; more people, more cheese.
ANSWER 2
Score 1
It's not unique. "Less" is a valid comparative of "little."