The English Oracle

In 18th century England, was "eat" the past tense of "eat" and how was it pronounced?

--------------------------------------------------
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------

Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Puzzle Game 5 Looping

--

Chapters
00:00 In 18th Century England, Was &Quot;Eat&Quot; The Past Tense Of &Quot;Eat&Quot; And How Was It Pronou
01:11 Accepted Answer Score 17
02:25 Answer 2 Score 9
03:33 Answer 3 Score 2
03:57 Thank you

--

Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...

--

Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...

--

Tags
#pronunciation #pronunciationvsspelling

#avk47



ACCEPTED ANSWER

Score 17


Yes, eat (pronounced /it/ and possibly /ɛt/) was a past tense form of "eat" in English until the 1800s and more recently in Scotland.

The OED lists a range of past tense forms of eat. The relevant ones are

1500s–1600s eate, 1600s–1800s eat, 1500s– ate

So "eat" (/it/) was a past tense form of "eat" in Boswell's time, although "ate" was also possible.

The OED also suggests the non-standard past-tense form "et" (/ɛt/) may relate to "eat" rather than "ate", by analogy with other past tense forms "read" (/rɛt/), "led" (from "lead"), etc.

The OED does not give a geographical range for the variants. The Scottish National Dictionary has citations of the /it/ form as late as the 20th century, including from Aberdeen in 1925

Peter, my neeper, mairriet a wife An' cudna keep 'er, He stappit her intull a bole i' the wa', An the mice eet 'er.

This uses the spelling "eet" rather than "eat" but spelling in Scots is considerably more varied.

James Boswell was of course a Scot, born in Edinburgh.




ANSWER 2

Score 9


Yes. In addition to the answer citing the Oxford English Dictionary, Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language (1755) also lists both ate and eat as the preterite (past tense) form of eat:

To EAT. v.a. preterite ate, or eat; part. eat, or eaten. [etan, Sax. itan, Gothick; eich, Erse.]

As for pronunciation, in John Walker's A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language (1791) (found in Eighteenth Century Collections Online; subscription needed), he claims that to eat is pronounced with a long /i/ but that the past tense form is usually pronounced et (/ɛt/):

The first sound of ea is like open e, and is heard in the following words: - Afeard, anneal, appeal, appear [...] easy, to eat, eaten, eaves [...] (p. 28)

The preterimperfect tense of eat is sometimes written ate, particularly by Lord Bolingbroke, and frequently, and, perhaps, more correctly, pronounced et, especially in Ireland; but eaten always preserved the ea long. (p. 29)




ANSWER 3

Score 2


Here in Yorkshire /ˈɛt/ is commonly used in Yorkshire dialect. And the past participle is /ˈɛtn/ (I think I've transcribed that correctly). Even people who don't speak dialect usually sing the last but one verse of the song "on Ilkley Moor baht 'at" using /ˈɛtn/, usually written "etten". (Then we shall all have etten thee...)