Sorry for the vulgarism, but is "motherf**ker" considered more insulting or racially offensive in some parts of the US?
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Puzzle Game 2 Looping
--
Chapters
00:00 Sorry For The Vulgarism, But Is &Quot;Motherf**Ker&Quot; Considered More Insulting Or Racially Offen
01:28 Answer 1 Score 0
01:49 Accepted Answer Score 2
02:26 Answer 3 Score 1
04:10 Answer 4 Score 0
04:56 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#offensivelanguage
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 2
There seems to be a divide between the North and South (i.e. NH and GA). The South, of course, gets cracked on a lot for "inbreeding", so maybe your GA friend was sensitive about said stereotype and took it really personally, especially because it came from a Northerner.
Another thing... My grandfather hates being called an "SOB", because he sees that as a direct attack on his mother, so maybe your friend felt like that when he was called an "MF"? It's best not to insult anyone's mother in the South without asking if it's okay first.
Source: Alabamian for 22 years.
ANSWER 2
Score 1
This site allows discussion on English usage hence the existence of this discussion on this site, even though it is discussing the usage of the vulgar word "motherfucker" (mf).
Contributor picus firstly stated that its usage is cultural; I think he's almost right, but I'd say that its usage is universal among native English speakers, and I'd add that it is also political in the sense of being a taboo word that blacks in the US, in particular, consider to be racially charged when the source is a representative of their perceived centuries-long oppressor.
I can only speculate, but isn't it reasonable to say that if NH were black then GA wouldn't have reacted so aggressively? The word mf comes within the category of words, like the word nigger, that blacks allow other blacks to use when addressing themselves but do not tolerate such usage by their oppressors.
I don't know if NH meant to be especially offensive to GA since it would all depend on timing and whether NH saw that it was GA who was the cause of the presumed accident; but it is certain that GA saw the identity of the verbal insulter and reacted accordingly.
Is this opinion far-fetched or ill-informed? Probably not, especially when such behaviour is seen in other contexts. Isn't such behaviour the explanation why blacks behave more violently when they are encountered by law officials, who are usually white, who in turn behave more aggressively because of their experiences with black suspects? Because of historical and perceived current discrimination, encounters between blacks and whites always have a racial tinge, and this occasion of the use of mf is an example.
To sum up, my answer to the question is that mf can be considered to be insulting depending on the context, and racially offensive depending on the perspective, and doesn't depend on location.
ANSWER 3
Score 0
I'm fairly certain that it is indiscriminately offensive, no matter who, where, or in what culture it's used. The disparity in how offensive it actually probably is merely a factor of how easily a person can be offended, rather than in anything tied to specific communities of people.
ANSWER 4
Score 0
The word actually comes from a time when they enacted the Slave Trade Act 1807,and had slave farms where they produce slaves and sold them...this was the practice in slave states of the United States and of slave owners to systematically force the reproduction of enslaved people to increase their profits.
It included coerced or forced sexual relations between enslaved men and women or girls, Mothers and sons and Father and daughters...forced pregnancies of enslaved women, and favoring women or young girls who could produce a relatively large number of children.
The objective was to increase the number of slaves without incurring the cost of purchase, and to fill labor shortages caused by the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade...and this same tactic was used for those who could not afford to buy numerous slaves but wanted more⦠Hence the term Mother Fugger