"A lost cause, that is."
--------------------------------------------------
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Hypnotic Orient Looping
--
Chapters
00:00 &Quot;A Lost Cause, That Is.&Quot;
00:36 Accepted Answer Score 4
00:53 Answer 2 Score 2
01:20 Answer 3 Score 0
01:35 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#grammaticality #wordorder
#avk47
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Hypnotic Orient Looping
--
Chapters
00:00 &Quot;A Lost Cause, That Is.&Quot;
00:36 Accepted Answer Score 4
00:53 Answer 2 Score 2
01:20 Answer 3 Score 0
01:35 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#grammaticality #wordorder
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 4
Sure, they're correct. The appended "I say" tends to sound a bit haughty or archaic, while the "that is" sounds a bit colloquial, but both are well within the bounds of accepted usage.
ANSWER 2
Score 2
That is probably not a good habit. It certainly will make you sound more "foreign."
Such phrases aren't confusing, but they don't seem to express anything. Few people nowadays add such flourishes; common ones I can think of are man, dude, yo, or no? — all of which relate to some kind of stereotypical, hackneyed speech.
By the way, the idiom is lost cause, not lost case.
ANSWER 3
Score 0
Of object and subject just an inversion it is... Kind of natural, it's easily understood, thats why. Worst contortions have we heard from all scopes of combinatory spoken. Etc!